<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ethan G. Salwen &#187; Articles In Print</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ethansalwen.com/category/portfolio/articles-in-print/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ethansalwen.com</link>
	<description>Journalist in Buenos Aires</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:15:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Clarifying the Clarity Control (ACR/LR)</title>
		<link>http://www.ethansalwen.com/2009/01/clarifying-clarity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethansalwen.com/2009/01/clarifying-clarity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethan G. Salwen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles In Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[After Capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In-Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Published Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Rickenberger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethansalwen.wordpress.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my latest RAW Processing Solutions column for AfterCapture I turned to digital imaging powerhouse Scott Rickenberger of Chase Jarvis Studios to shed some light on Clarity, the nifty and powerful, but confusing and often-misunderstood raw developing control in ACR and Lightroom. After Scott (and some other friends) clued me in on Clarity I&#8217;m see [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rangefindermag.com/repository/ac/articles/pdf/AC1008_RAW_Salwen.pdf"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-426" title="egsr_article_exposure" src="http://ethansalwen.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/egsr_article_exposure.jpg" alt="egsr_article_exposure" width="216" height="261" /></a>In my latest RAW Processing Solutions column for <a title="AfterCapture" href="http://www.aftercapture.com/" target="_blank">AfterCapture</a> I turned to digital imaging powerhouse <a href="http://www.chasejarvis.com/#mi=1&amp;pt=0&amp;pi=10&amp;p=-1&amp;a=0&amp;at=0" target="_blank">Scott Rickenberger</a> of <a href="http://www.chasejarvis.com/" target="_blank">Chase Jarvis Studios</a> to shed some light on Clarity, the nifty and powerful, but confusing and often-misunderstood raw developing control in ACR and Lightroom.</p>
<p>After Scott (and some other friends) clued me in on Clarity I&#8217;m see how well I can use (and not use) this gem. It turns out that a +100 Clarity setting might work great on one image while +5 might ruin another. All depends on content.</p>
<p>If your not fully Clarity conscientious <a href="http://www.rangefindermag.com/repository/ac/articles/pdf/AC1008_RAW_Salwen.pdf" target="_blank">read my article,</a> and let me know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethansalwen.com/2009/01/clarifying-clarity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

